For any interpretive project, good planning makes design decisions easy. Planning is especially important in choosing materials for outdoor signs, since they will be subjected to a variety of site-specific environmental factors including weather, rigorous maintenance routines and equipment, graffiti, pollution, wild animals and even target practice.
One client we worked with had installed a porcelain enamel map at their site in a remote area of the Southern California desert. After only one year, their beautiful (and expensive) map was riddled with bullet holes! We were able to replace it with a more reasonably priced, high-pressure laminate (HPL) map, which isn’t so easily damaged by bullets.
In the following article, I’ll introduce you to the materials I most commonly recommend for use in outdoor interpretative exhibits — both for exhibit panels and the supporting structures. I also provide a list of questions you and your team can ask in order to determine what qualities to look for in materials. I’m also providing matrices I’ve developed (and which I use myself) for weighing project needs against the pros and cons of different materials. Lastly, I’ve listed questions you should ask your fabricator when considering any new material.
In the future, I’ll be regularly posting tips on Spark about planning for interpretive panels. If there is something in particular you’d like me to address, please mention it in a comment at the end of this article.
Some common panel materials
HPL panels mounted in painted steel supports.
One of the materials clients most often select is high-pressure laminate (HPL). It stands up well to many outdoor settings, has very good image quality, and is reasonably priced. Another popular material is fiberglass embedded digital graphics. These products can last up to ten years in protected areas, have decent image quality, and cost a little less than HPL. There are also a variety of vinyl graphic options and combinations available. These can be good, quick, low-cost solutions for temporary signs that will last up to three years in protected areas. Porcelain enamel, etched metal, and etched stone are all extremely durable and the most environmentally friendly because of their production process and ability to be recycled. On the other hand, these products vary in image quality and have the highest up-front costs.
Some common support materials
Since supports don’t have to carry content, your primary considerations are strength and durability. Aesthetically, you may want the support material to work thematically with the content. There is a huge variety of materials on the market for panel supports. I’m listing just a few of the materials I most often use.
Metal is the sturdiest support material. Weathering steel, best known as “COR-TEN steel,” forms a stable rust-like finish, eliminating the need for paint. It is virtually maintenance free, but can be hard to obtain, and the price varies with market availability. Galvanized steel also requires little or no maintenance, and it is both readily available and relatively inexpensive. Most other metals will require some kind of finish treatment (clear coat, paint, sandblast, etc.) for outdoor life.
HPL panel with composite wood supports.
Wood may or may not require a finish treatment, but should be combined with a metal or concrete foundation to avoid rot and termites. Pressure-treated wood can go straight into the ground, but releases harmful chemicals into the soil. Composite wood (Trex®) products can also go straight into the ground and are made from recycled materials. Currently, none of the composite wood products are recyclable.
Fiberglass is fun to work with because it can be formed into almost any shape, and can achieve a high aesthetic. Color can be either embedded in the resins or surface applied using appropriate paints. However, it is usually expensive due to labor and material costs, and since it isn’t recyclable, it’s less environmentally-friendly than the other options.
What to know before choosing materials
As you can see, choosing materials for both panels and supports is a question of weighing pros and cons to find the best solution, or combination of solutions, for your particular project. There is no such thing as the “ideal” material for outdoor panels. For any given project, I ask my clients a series of questions to help them determine the project’s requirements:
- What’s the budget?
- What’s the schedule?
- What’s the life expectancy of the sign program?
- What’s the content? All text? Photos, maps, illustrations?
- What image quality, and level of detail does the project’s content require? How many colors will it require?
- What’s the physical location and environment? Urban or remote? What is the terrain like? Weather exposure? How likely is vandalism? Are there various mounting options?
Using matrices to weigh your options
After content for an outdoor panel has been determined, and we know the answers to the above questions, I sit down with my clients to choose materials. We use these matrices to make sure we’re clear about the best choices, and that we’re making decisions based on the extent to which the materials meet the project’s needs.
Panel Material Matrix (PDF, 460KB)
Support Material Matrix (PDF, 444KB)
What to ask when you’re considering a particular material
Porcelain with steel stand.
I haven’t included every single available material in the matrices above. Still, any time you’re considering a material to display your carefully crafted content, you need to know just what that material is going to deliver. You can use this list of questions as a reference to make sure you have all the answers you need.
- What is the availability and lead time of the product?
- Is the image quality of the material appropriate for your content?
- What is the lifetime of the product? And specifically, what is the life expectancy of the product in the environment of the desired location?
- What is involved in the installation of the product?
- How is the product maintained? Are there recommended maintenance schedules or care products and procedures?
- What are the initial costs?
- What are the environmental considerations, i.e., recycled content, FSC-certifications, recyclability?
- What is the material’s lifetime aesthetic in context of the sign program’s life span? In other words, will the panel and support materials look good as long as the you want the sign program to last?
- What is the lifetime value? Is it a good value for the length of time it will be in service?
Again, when we know the answers to the above questions, we can determine our best choices and make decisions based on the extent to which the materials meet the project’s needs.
Well developed content is fundamental. Keeping abreast of the advances in sign technology is important. But good planning is essential in effectively and aesthetically communicating your message to the visitor. Happy planning!





{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
Dear Tanya,
Thank you for your great article. I am interested in your evaluation of the different kinds of panel materials. I use Pannier’s embedded fiberglass most of the time because it is a good quality material and the customer service is the very best there is. Fossil material is good, but I have had very bad experiences with their customer services. Basically, I go for the company that is easiest to work with. Who do you go to for High Pressure Laminate and who is your favorite rep in that company? I would like to use more HPL, but the customer service means a great deal to me, too.
Also, I did a text with samples of my art on both HPL from Fossil and Pannier’s fiberglass. The HPL image scratched off with a knife while the embedded image in the fiberglass was untouched. The scratch on the fiberglass could be buffed out. Both panels were marred by a sharpie pen.
Thank you,
Erica
Hi Erica,
Thanks for the interest in the article. I hope it proved helpful.
I agree with your comment about Pannier and their customer service. They’re awesome. My experience with with fiberglass embedded graphics is mixed. The image quality and price is good, but in our Southern California sun, the product has faded well before the 10 year claim. We used it in a botanical garden and the panels were replaced after 3 years. Pannier has always replaced it for no charge, but it still costs in time and maintenance. I suggest being selective where you use the product… shade or semi-protected. In more northern climates it may stand up better to full sun.
HPL has been more successful here in the full sun. I use iZone in Texas (www.izoneimaging.com). They have provided great customer service for us and I find them really easy to work with. If there has been a problem, they have addressed it right away.
Albert Moreno, Sales Representative
albert@izoneimaging.com
iZone
2526 Charter Oak Drive, Suite 100
Temple, TX 76502-4844
888/464-9663×110 Toll Free
254/778-0722×110 Voice
254/778-0938 Fax
I have not used Fossil, mainly because we try to use the closest manufacturer and because iZone has been great. iZone does recommend using a polymer-based car or boat wax to aid in removal of graffiti or dirt. Usually, organic solvents like Simple Green or Goof-Off will work to remove graffiti. When it has been scratched, it has been buffed out. Overall, we have had very good experience with HPL and iZone.
Please remember there is no grafffiti PROOF product, only graffiti RESISTANT.
Tanya